B-SLR Methodological Template
Word limits of academic journals can challenge the detailed report of the necessary methodological steps in the application of different types of methods and frameworkds, including B-SLR. To assist researchers in crafting effective methods sections, we suggest a succinct yet punctual template to guide the structuring of B-SLR-based papers' methodology sections.
We present below a streamlined methodological section template for studies using the B-SLR framework. The proposed methodological section template incorporates the key stages delineated in the B-SLR workflow. This template is designed for users to populate with their specific, contextual information. Green italicized sections indicate areas for user input.
Please note that additional information could be included, for example, quotations of key definitions for inclusion and exclusion criteria, the number of clusters that emerged and eventually, the number of papers selected within each cluster.
The present study applies the Bibliometric-Systematic Literature Review (B-SLR) framework (XXX - Blinded for the review process - XXX). As a first step, on (insert here the date of the first scrutinisation as per step one of B-SLR guide) we scrutinised the literature on (insert here the topic) to build an overview of the research stream and implement a set of the representative keywords for database research.
Following the B-SLR framework, we delineate our inclusion/exclusion criteria before approaching the data collection process. To do so, we leveraged a comprehensive set of key definitions in the field of inquiry (insert here the references of the papers used to define the inclusion criteria - the first step of the B-SLR guide).
As a result, we defined the search query as follows: (insert here the complete search query). On (date of when the query has been run in the first instance), we ran the search query in (insert the name of the adopted database - step three of the B-SLR guide) database, limiting the documents to the ones published in the English language, the document type to (type of included documents - step four of the B-SLR guide) published between (time span - step fours of the B-SLR guide). We extracted a raw database of (number of documents extracted - step five of the B-SLR guide), cross-validating the outcomes of our search with (insert the name of the database(s) for cross-check(s) - step four of the B-SLR guide), removing duplicates and ineligible documents.
From the raw database, we removed studies not falling within the boundaries of our selected topic, consistent with our inclusion/exclusion criteria. The authors have carried out this process independently, checking their agreement with Krippendorff's Alpha yielding a value of (insert here the Krippendorff's Alpha value that can be obtained with K-Alpha Calculator available at https://www.k-alpha.org/ with documentation) (Marzi et al., 2024). This has resulted in a final dataset of (insert the number of documents - step five of the B-SLR guide) documents.
Next, we moved to bibliometric analysis in VOSviewer (insert the version of the software) (van Eck & Waltman, 2010), adopting (insert the aggregation criterion - step six of the B-SLR guide) as the aggregation criterion.
After independently reading the extracted documents, we identified the key research topic within each cluster. Once a satisfactory level of agreement among authors was reached (resolution=(insert the number here - step seven of the B-SLR guide)); minimum cluster size=(insert the number here - step seven of the B-SLR guide)). We assessed and ranked the documents based on (report here the assessment and ranking criteria - step eight of the B-SLR guide). Next, we selected a representative sub-sample of documents based on (report here the selection criteria - step eight of the B-SLR guide. If all the documents have been included, skip this passage).
Next, the clusters have been reviewed, following the prescriptions of systematic literature reviews by mapping the state of knowledge and grasping the content of the literature. The theorising perimeter has been established through (report the approach(es) used for setting the theorising perimeter and the motivation for the choice - see step ten), providing further insights on the topic under exploration, thus developing an original conceptual advancement to the field.
References cited in the B-SLR Methodological Template
Marzi, G., Balzano, M., & Marchiori, D. (2024). K-Alpha Calculator–Krippendorff's Alpha Calculator: A user-friendly tool for computing Krippendorff's Alpha inter-rater reliability coefficient. MethodsX, 12, 102545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102545
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3